The following Dodgers have been smited by the JDK for their crimes against Jam:
All the girls! for picking on the JDK and damaging his already delicate self esteem!
The Basserd Who Nicked Copper's Stuff For the offense of nicking Copper's stuff. You are a tw*t, whoever you are and we all hope you get run over by a tram in Nottingham. Or Liverpool. Or whereever else they have trams!
Copper For the crime of playing with her Wii instead of her Jammie pals!
So I saw a thing on the news this morning about Alistair Darling wanting to bring in a complicated satellite system to monitor road usage and charge us for every mile we drive by installing a black box reciver/transmitter thingie in every car. We would then presumably receive a bill at the end of the month or year. The cost would range from 2p per mile on country lanes to £1.30-something at peak times on motorways. Rather than being a revenue-raising excersise, apparently this is all in aid of reducing congestion - making us think about the cost of driving before undertaking any journey.
Hmm. I can see their point, although it is somewhat obscured by all the comedy pound signs.
Seem like a rather convoluted and expensive way to go about it.
Oooh. I just found an article on the BBC site about it. Far more eloquent than my post!
yup, its supposed to belanced out by reduced fuel tax and VED, so they say....
hate to say it but we already have a system which makes those that use the roads (or drive inefficient cars) the most pay more. Its called fuel tax, more you drive, more you pay, simple, why the need for this i don't know.
This system would also appear to take away the environmental benefits of the current system too (variable VED, efficient vehicles cost less to run)
Could it be something to do with keeping tabs on where you (well your car) are at all times? - no thats just being paranoid, surely?
Anyone know what one of these boxes is gonna cost, and who's going to pay for it? (hahaha, as if i don't know the answer to that already...)
hmmm:
"you would reduce the congestion that we would otherwise face and you would avoid the gridlock that you see in many American cities today," he said."
any of our American resident friends like to comment on this?
...hate to say it but we already have a system which makes those that use the roads (or drive inefficient cars) the most pay more. Its called fuel tax, more you drive, more you pay, simple, why the need for this i don't know...
...and you would avoid the gridlock that you see in many American cities today,"...
Of course the counter-argument to your most excellent fuel-tax point is that different roads would cost different amounts - little used country lanes costing 2p a mile and city centre and motorways costing £1.34 - the aim being to tackle congestion in the cities and on motorways (more on that in a sec). So you would effectively have to charge different amounts for the fuel depending on the driver's intentions. The obvious way around this is to chage more tax on city and motorway service station petrol and less on country, but all that would happen is that people will drive out to the country to get their petrol.
With the black box route, taking Bristol as an example, rather than drive down the M32 (motorway) into the centre, I would reduce my costs by driving down the A38 (narrow, twisty urban road), as would everybody else. How does that help the congestion issue?
With regards to American gridlock... if they'd only drive smaller cars, there'd be more space on the roads. Problem solved. Get them all Ladas.
agreed, but scrapping fuel tax/VED does not encourage more efficient vehicles, therefore less congestion, more SUVs, more climate change and dead kiddies